<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A SERIOUS MAN &#8211; the second best film of 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodisthenewbad.com/a-serious-man-the-second-best-film-of-2009-234.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodisthenewbad.com/a-serious-man-the-second-best-film-of-2009-234.htm</link>
	<description>Everyone has an opinion. Yours is probably wrong.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: franky</title>
		<link>http://goodisthenewbad.com/a-serious-man-the-second-best-film-of-2009-234.htm/comment-page-1#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>franky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 02:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodisthenewbad.com/?p=234#comment-503</guid>
		<description>wurd pboz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wurd pboz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://goodisthenewbad.com/a-serious-man-the-second-best-film-of-2009-234.htm/comment-page-1#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodisthenewbad.com/?p=234#comment-425</guid>
		<description>I am surprised to hear that you think this was a &quot;vastly better film&quot; than No Country for Old Men.  I loved A Serious Man and it was definitely a great Coen Brothers film, but No Country for Old Men was absolutely wonderful in a completely different way.  I think both would have to be ranked to if you ask me.  Great review by the way.  And I do see where you are coming from on the better than No Country claim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised to hear that you think this was a &#8220;vastly better film&#8221; than No Country for Old Men.  I loved A Serious Man and it was definitely a great Coen Brothers film, but No Country for Old Men was absolutely wonderful in a completely different way.  I think both would have to be ranked to if you ask me.  Great review by the way.  And I do see where you are coming from on the better than No Country claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pboz</title>
		<link>http://goodisthenewbad.com/a-serious-man-the-second-best-film-of-2009-234.htm/comment-page-1#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>pboz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodisthenewbad.com/?p=234#comment-422</guid>
		<description>&quot;God&quot; is spelled with an &quot;o&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;God&#8221; is spelled with an &#8220;o&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

